Cover
Vol. 19 No. 1 (2025)

Published: June 30, 2025

Pages: 68-86

Research Article

A Study of Viscous Dampers for Enhanced Seismic Performance in Reinforced Concrete Multi-Storey Building

Fawad Ullah 1 Muhammad Ameer Hamza Jamal Butt Muhammad Usama 2 Ubaid Ullah 3
1Department of Civil Engineering, COMSATS University Islamabad, Abbottabad Campus, Abbottabad, Pakistan
2Department of Geodesy and Geoinformatics, HafenCity University Hamburg, 20457 , Hamburg, Germany
3Department of Civil Engineering, University of Wah, Pakistan
History
  • Received: January 14, 2025
  • Revised: June 15, 2025
  • Accepted: June 21, 2025
  • Available Online: June 30, 2025
DOI

https://doi.org/10.37650/ijce.25.0025

Abstract

This study investigates the seismic performance of a nine-storey reinforced concrete building located in Seismic Zone 3, focusing on the effectiveness of viscous dampers in enhancing structural resilience. With increasing seismic risks, the integration of damping systems has become critical for mitigating vibrations and improving building safety. The research evaluates four configurations: a fixed-base building with no dampers, buildings with corner dampers featuring uniform and varying force capacities, and a building with middle dampers. The Equivalent Static Load (ESL) and Response Spectrum study (RSA) methods are used in the ETABS 2021 research to look at important factors such the natural period, storey stiffness, storey drift, storey displacement, and overturning moments.   These steps are based on the UBC 97 criteria.    The results show that viscous dampers do assist structures stay standing during earthquakes.    Buildings with corner dampers that could handle different amounts of stress had a natural period that was 37.5% shorter. This means that they were stiffer and could respond to seismic shocks faster. The storey's stiffness went down by 16.7%, and the periods of overturning went down by 5.7%.   This shows that the dampers did a great job of getting rid of energy.    Also, the maximum storey displacement and drift were 41.6% and 48.14% lower than in the fixed-base model, respectively.    These figures show how important it is to put dampers in the right places, especially at corners where the force capacity changes, to make buildings more resistant to earthquakes. The study's conclusion is that viscous dampers make multi-story structures in moderate seismic zones much safer by making them less likely to break and improving how effectively they perform. This study gives engineers and designers important information that makes them desire to use current dampening technologies in tall buildings to make them safer during earthquakes.

Keywords

References

  1. Abdi, A. A. (2022). Comparative study for earthquake performance of steel buildings with seismic isolator and fixed based steel buildings with damper [Master’s thesis, Işık Üniversitesi].
  2. Amanti, M., Muraro, C., Roma, M., Chiessi, V., Puzzilli, L. M., Catalano, S., … Tallini, M. (2020). Geological and geotechnical models definition for 3rd level seismic microzonation studies in Central Italy. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 18, 5441–5473.
  3. De Domenico, D., & Hajirasouliha, I. (2021). Multi-level performance-based design optimisation of steel frames with nonlinear viscous dampers. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 19(12), 5015–5049.
  4. De Domenico, D., Ricciardi, G., & Takewaki, I. (2019). Design strategies of viscous dampers for seismic protection of building structures: A review. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 118, 144–165.
  5. Elwardany, H., Jankowski, R., & Seleemah, A. (2021). Mitigating the seismic pounding of multi-storey buildings in series using linear and nonlinear fluid viscous dampers. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 21(4), 137.
  6. Fahiminia, M., & Shishegaran, A. (2020). Evaluation of a developed bypass viscous damper performance. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 14, 773–791.
  7. Gardezi, H., Ikrama, M., Usama, M., Iqbal, M., Jalal, F. E., Hussain, A., & Li, X. (2024). Predictive modeling of rutting depth in modified asphalt mixes using gene-expression programming (GEP): A sustainable use of RAP, fly ash, and plastic waste. Construction and Building Materials, 443, 137809.
  8. Hehn, A. (2021). Fluid power troubleshooting. CRC Press.
  9. Hu, X., Zhang, R., Ren, X., Pan, C., Zhang, X., & Li, H. (2022). Simplified design method for structure with viscous damper based on the specified damping distribution pattern. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 26(3), 1367–1387.
  10. Kynčlová, P., Upadhyaya, S., & Nice, T. (2020). Composite index as a measure on achieving Sustainable Development Goal 9 (SDG-9) industry-related targets: The SDG-9 index. Applied Energy, 265, 114755.
  11. Liu, Y., Jing, G., Liu, H., Zhang, W., Han, M., Xiao, S., & Zhang, Z. (2022). Failure analysis and design improvements of steel piston for a high-power marine diesel engine. Engineering Failure Analysis, 142, 106825.
  12. Ma, Y., Xing, Y., Ong, M. C., & Hemmingsen, T. H. (2021). Baseline design of a subsea shuttle tanker system for liquid carbon dioxide transportation. Ocean Engineering, 240, 109891.
  13. Moreira, D. C., Furtado, H. C., Buarque, J. S., Cardoso, B. R., Merlin, B., & Moreira, D. D. C. (2019). Failure analysis of AISI 410 stainless-steel piston rod in spillway floodgate. Engineering Failure Analysis, 97, 506–517.
  14. Nishanth, C. L., Swaroop, Y. S., Jagarapu, D. C. K., & Jogi, P. K. (2020). Analysis and design of commercial building with different slab arrangements using ETABS. Materials Today: Proceedings, 33, 700–704.
  15. Pergalani, F., Pagliaroli, A., Bourdeau, C., Compagnoni, M., Lenti, L., Lualdi, M., … Verrubbi, V. (2020). Seismic microzoning map: approaches, results and applications after the 2016–2017 Central Italy seismic sequence. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 18, 5595–5629.
  16. Prajapati, K. K., & Butala, A. M. (2020). Study on the performance of reinforced concrete structure with viscous damper with El Centro earthquake time history. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(5), 858–864.
  17. Prugh, R. W. (2009). Chemical process safety. In L. F. Albright (Ed.), Albright’s Chemical Engineering Handbook (pp. 1437–1484). CRC Press.
  18. Riaz, R. D., Malik, U. J., Shah, M. U., Usman, M., & Najam, F. A. (2023). Enhancing seismic resilience of existing reinforced concrete building using non-linear viscous dampers: A comparative study. Actuators, 12(4), 175.
  19. Rogovyi, A., Korohodskyi, V., & Medvediev, Y. (2021). Influence of Bingham fluid viscosity on energy performances of a vortex chamber pump. Energy, 218, 119432.
  20. Rohith Kumar, J., Satyanarayana, G. V. V., & Ravi Dakshina Murthy, N. (2023). Design and analysis of multi-storey building having visco-elastic dampers. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2754(1).
  21. Romanos, G. E., Delgado‐Ruiz, R., & Sculean, A. (2019). Concepts for prevention of complications in implant therapy. Periodontology 2000, 81(1), 7–17.
  22. Scozzese, F., Gioiella, L., Dall’Asta, A., Ragni, L., & Tubaldi, E. (2021). Influence of viscous dampers ultimate capacity on the seismic reliability of building structures. Structural Safety, 91, 102096.
  23. Sener, R., Yangaz, M. U., & Gul, M. Z. (2020). Effects of injection strategy and combustion chamber modification on a single-cylinder diesel engine. Fuel, 266, 117122.
  24. Sharma, K. V., Parmar, V., Gautam, L., Choudhary, S., & Gohil, J. (2023). Modelling efficiency of fluid viscous dampers positioning for increasing tall buildings’ resilience to earthquakes induced structural vibrations. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 173, 108108.
  25. Singh, B. (2023). Federated learning for envision future trajectory smart transport system for climate preservation and smart green planet: Insights into global governance and SDG-9 (Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure). National Journal of Environmental Law, 6(2), 6–17.
  26. Sinha, A., Sengupta, T., & Alvarado, R. (2020). Interplay between technological innovation and environmental quality: Formulating the SDG policies for next 11 economies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 242, 118549.
  27. Sinha, A., Sengupta, T., & Saha, T. (2020). Technology policy and environmental quality at crossroads: Designing SDG policies for select Asia Pacific countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161, 120317.
  28. Usama, M., Gardezi, H., Jalal, F. E., Rehman, M. A., Javed, N., Janjua, S., & Iqbal, M. (2023). Predictive modelling of compression strength of waste GP/FA blended expansive soils using multi-expression programming. Construction and Building Materials, 392, 131956.
  29. Venczel, M. (2023). Multidisciplinary analysis and development methodologies for torsional vibration dampers in vehicle industry [Doctoral dissertation, Budapest University of Technology and Economics].
  30. Volokitin, A. V., Volokitina, I. E., & Panin, E. A. (2022). Thermomechanical treatment of stainless steel piston rings. Progress in Physics of Metals, 23(3).
  31. Volokitina, I., Siziakova, E., Fediuk, R., & Kolesnikov, A. (2022). Development of a thermomechanical treatment mode for stainless-steel rings. Materials, 15(14), 4930.
  32. Wang, S., Zhang, H., Chen, Z., Hua, X., & Feng, Z. (2024). Simplified nonlinear damping force formula for rotary eddy current dampers and comparative hazard analysis under seismic excitation with fluid viscous dampers. Journal of Structural Engineering, 150(4), 04024022.
  33. Xu, Z., Li, W., Liu, X., & Chen, Z. (2019). Dynamic characteristics of coupling model of valve-controlled cylinder parallel accumulator. Mechanics & Industry, 20(3), 306.
  34. Yang, C., Zhou, L., Wang, J., Xu, T., Yang, C., & Ye, G. (2023). Research on energy saving system of hydraulic excavator based on three-chamber accumulator. Journal of Energy Storage, 72, 108571.
  35. Zhou, Y., Sebaq, M. S., & Xiao, Y. (2022). Energy dissipation demand and distribution for multi-storey buildings with fluid viscous dampers. Engineering Structures, 253, 113813.
  36. Zhu, R., Guo, T., & Mwangilwa, F. (2020). Development and test of a self-centering fluidic viscous damper. Advances in Structural Engineering, 23(13), 2835–2849.