Cover
Vol. 19 No. 1 (2025)

Published: June 30, 2025

Pages: 118-128

Research Article

Strength and Permeation Characteristics of Zeolite-based Geopolymer Lightweight Concrete

Awaz S. Nader 1 Ameer A. Hilal* 2
1Department of Survey, Kalar Technical Institute, Garmian Polytechnic University/ Kurdistan Region/Iraq
2Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Anbar, Al-Ramadi, Iraq
History
  • Received: April 16, 2025
  • Revised: June 28, 2025
  • Accepted: June 30, 2025
  • Available Online: June 30, 2025
DOI

https://doi.org/10.37650/ijce.25.0029

Abstract

Geopolymer concrete is a material manufactured by polymerizing sources of aluminates and silicates like fly ash, metakaolin, slag, zeolite, etc. with an alkaline solution. A study has been undertaken to produce lightweight geopolymer concrete by using waste zeolite particles (zeolite molecular sieve) as aluminates and silicates source and at the same time as lightweight medium. In addition, others three geopolymer lightweight concrete mixes were produced by partially replacing the waste zeolite particles (25% of volume) with sources materials (fly ash type F, fly ash type C and waste zeolite powder. Moreover, the impact of this partially replacement on dry density, compressive strength and permeation characteristics of produced geopolymer lightweight mixes was studied. An alkaline solution of sodium silicate and sodium hydroxide was used in all the investigated mixes as an activator. From the findings, a geopolymer lightweight mix suitable for insulation purposes (density of 1610 kg/m3 and 28 days compressive strength of 5.1 MPa) was successfully produced using waste zeolite molecular sieve. It was found also that the lightweight zeolite particles were uniformly distributed through the produced mixes.  Finally, it was found that replacement of 25% of volume of zeolite particles by fly ash (type C) helped in not only enhancing the compressive strength by about 13% but also reducing the water absorption by about 33%.

Keywords

References

  1. Al Bakri, A. M., Kamarudin, H., Omar, A. K., Norazian, M. N., Ruzaidi, C. M., & Rafiza, A. R. (2011). The effect of alkaline activator ratio on the compressive strength of fly ash-based geopolymers. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(9), 1916-1922.
  2. Aleem, M. I., & Arumairaj, P. D. (2012). Geopolymer concrete–a review. International journal of engineering sciences & emerging technologies, 1(2), 118-122.
  3. Alnahhal, A. M., Alengaram, U. J., Yusoff, S., Darvish, P., Srinivas, K., & Sumesh, M. (2022). Engineering performance of sustainable geopolymer foamed and non-foamed concretes. Construction and Building Materials, 316, 125601.
  4. Antoni, A., Wijaya, S. W., & Hardjito, D. (2016, February). Factors affecting the setting time of fly ash-based geopolymer. In Materials science forum (Vol. 841, pp. 90-97). Trans Tech Publications Ltd.
  5. ASTM C618. (2008). Standard Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use in Concrete. American Society for Testing and Materials International, West Conshohocken, PA.
  6. ASTM C1585. (2013). Standard Test Method for Measurement of Rate of Absorption of Water by Hydraulic-Cement Concretes. American Society for Testing and Materials International, West Conshohocken, PA.
  7. ASTM C513. (2011). Standard Test Method for Obtaining and Testing Specimens of Hardened Lightweight Insulating Concrete for Compressive Strength. American Society for Testing and Materials International, West Conshohocken, PA.
  8. Böke, N., Birch, G. D., Nyale, S. M., & Petrik, L. F. (2015). New synthesis method for the production of coal fly ash-based foamed geopolymers. Construction and building materials, 75, 189-199.
  9. Chanda, S. S., & Guchhait, S. (2024). A comprehensive review on the factors influencing engineering characteristics of lightweight geopolymer concrete. Journal of Building Engineering, 86, 108887.
  10. Duxson, P., & Provis, J. L. (2008). Designing precursors for geopolymer cements. Journal of the american ceramic society, 91(12), 3864-3869.
  11. Erfanimanesh, A., & Sharbatdar, M. K. (2020). Mechanical and microstructural characteristics of geopolymer paste, mortar, and concrete containing local zeolite and slag activated by sodium carbonate. Journal of Building Engineering, 32, 101781.
  12. Hilal, A. A., & Mahmood, F. I. (2018, September). On Production of Pre-Formed Foamed Geopolymer Concrete. In 2018 11th International Conference on Developments in eSystems Engineering (DeSE) (pp. 290-294). IEEE.
  13. Hilal, A. A., Nader, A. S., & Kurji, B. M. (2024). Producing Sustainable Lightweight Geopolymer Concrete Using Waste Materials. Civil and Environmental Engineering, 20(2), 1120-1128.
  14. Hilal, A. A., Thom, N. H., & Dawson, A. R. (2014). Pore structure and permeation characteristics of foamed concrete. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, 12(12), 535-544.
  15. Hilal, A. A., Thom, N. H., & Dawson, A. R. (2015). On void structure and strength of foamed concrete made without/with additives. Construction and Building Materials, 85, 157-164.
  16. Kurji, B. M., Mujtaba, I. M., & Abbas, A. S. (2023). Synthesis, Characterizations, and Recent Applications of the Silica-based Mobil Composition of Mesoporous Material: A Review. Iraqi Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, 24(3), 1-12.
  17. Lo, T. Y., Cui, H. Z., Nadeem, A., & Li, Z. G. (2006). The effects of air content on permeability of lightweight concrete. Cement and concrete research, 36(10), 1874-1878.
  18. Lo, T. Y., Cui, H., Memon, S. A., & Noguchi, T. (2016). Manufacturing of sintered lightweight aggregate using high-carbon fly ash and its effect on the mechanical properties and microstructure of concrete. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 753-762.
  19. Ma, C. K., Awang, A. Z., & Omar, W. (2018). Structural and material performance of geopolymer concrete: A review. Construction and Building Materials, 186, 90-102.
  20. Masoule, M. S. T., Bahrami, N., Karimzadeh, M., Mohasanati, B., Shoaei, P., Ameri, F., & Ozbakkaloglu, T. (2022). Lightweight geopolymer concrete: A critical review on the feasibility, mixture design, durability properties, and microstructure. Ceramics International, 48(8), 10347-10371.
  21. Nader, A. S., Hilal, A. A., & Alwan, G. H. (2022). Investigating the properties of foamed fly ash and metakaolin-based geopolymer concrete. Civil Engineering and Architecture, 10(7), 2820-2832.
  22. Nagrockiene, D., & Girskas, G. (2016). Research into the properties of concrete modified with natural zeolite addition. Construction and Building Materials, 113, 964-969.
  23. Nambiar, E. K., & Ramamurthy, K. (2007). Sorption characteristics of foam concrete. Cement and concrete research, 37(9), 1341-1347.
  24. Nemec, J., Gandel, R., Jerabek, J., Sucharda, O., & Bilek, V. (2024). Properties of Selected Alkali-activated Materials for Sustainable development. Civil and Environmental Engineering, 20(1), 307-318.
  25. Nikolov, A., Rostovsky, I., & Nugteren, H. (2017). Geopolymer materials based on natural zeolite. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 6, 198-205.
  26. Obaid, H. A., & Hilal, A. A. (2021). Foam concrete made with micro and nano silica sand: Pore structure and properties. Advances in Concrete Construction, 12(3), 207-216.
  27. Xu, R., Pang, W., Yu, J., Huo, Q., & Chen, J. (2007). Chemistry of Zeolites and Related Porous Materials. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470822371
  28. Zahid, M., Shafiq, N., Nuruddin, M. F., Nikbakht, E., & Jalal, A. (2017). Effect of partial replacement of fly ash by metakaolin on strength development of fly ash based geopolymer mortar. Key Engineering Materials, 744, 131-135.