Cover
Vol. 19 No. 1 (2025)

Published: June 30, 2025

Pages: 129-141

Research Article

Structural Behavior of  SCC Hollow Beam Reinforced with GFRP Containing EPS and Plastic Fiber

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to produce a modified SCC that involves the incorporation of expanded polystyrene (EPS) and waste of plastic type (PET). The goal is to minimize the weight of the material while simultaneously improving its brittleness and reducing the environmental impact. The study focuses on two methods for reducing the weight of structural elements by using EPS beads, which create voids through concrete, and the second method is making a hollow through the element. This study included designing and investigating four concrete beams under concentrated static load. The parameters were hollow position and material types. The results showed that the offsetting hollow from the center of the beam enhanced the ductility index by 10% and increased the load capacity by 10%. Adding EPS beads reduce the concrete density by 11.5% and load capacity by 22%. Toughness was improved by using plastic fiber due to the mechanism of crack bridging. The crack pattern had been changed due to the utilization of waste material, and enhancement was observed through experimental tests by making smooth cracks and changing the probability of sudden failure when using GFRP rebars. It was found that the optimal quantity of EPS was 2 kg to produce SCC in accordance with code requirements. No debonding or slip was observed during monitoring, as evidenced by the absence of spalling or cracking around the reinforcement.

References

  1. Abbass, A. A., Abid, S. R., Arna’ot, F. H., Al-Ameri, R. A., & Özakça, M. (2020). Flexural response of hollow high strength concrete beams considering different size reductions. Structures, 23, 69–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ISTRUC.2019.10.001
  2. ACI 440.1R-15. (2015). Guide for the design and construction of structural concrete reinforced with fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) bars. American Concrete Institute.
  3. Al-Hadithi, A. I., Hilal, N. N., Al-Gburi, M., & Midher, A. H. (2023). Structural behavior of reinforced lightweight self-compacting concrete beams using expanded polystyrene as coarse aggregate and containing polyethylene terephthalate fibers. Structural Concrete, 24(5), 5808–5826. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.202200381
  4. Ali H. Allawi, A. I. A.-H. , A. S. M. (2021). Effects of Waste Plastic PET Fibers on The Fresh and Hardened of Normal Concrete. IRAQI JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING.
  5. Al-Maliki, H. N. G., Al-Balhawi, A., Alshimmeri, A. J. H., & Zhang, B. (2021). Structural efficiency of hollow reinforced concrete beams subjected to partial uniformly distributed loading. Buildings, 11(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11090391
  6. Alnuaimi, A. S., Al-Jabri, K. S., & Hago, A. (2008). Comparison between solid and hollow reinforced concrete beams. Materials and Structures/Materiaux et Constructions, 41(2), 269–286. https://doi.org/10.1617/S11527-007-9237-X/TABLES/6
  7. ASTM C39/C39M. (n.d.). Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens 1. https://doi.org/10.1520/C0039_C0039M-2
  8. ASTM C1609/C1609M-12. (2009). Standard Test Method for Flexural Performance of Fiber-Reinforced Concrete (Using Beam With Third-Point Loading). https://doi.org/10.1520/C1609_C1609M-12
  9. Borg, R. P., Baldacchino, O., & Ferrara, L. (2016). Early age performance and mechanical characteristics of recycled PET fibre reinforced concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 108, 29–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2016.01.029
  10. Castano, J. E., & Abdel-Mohti, A. (2024). Assessing the Impact of Recycled Concrete Aggregates on the Fresh and Hardened Properties of Self-Consolidating Concrete for Structural Precast Applications. Infrastructures, 9(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures9100177
  11. EFNARC. (2005). The European Guidelines for Self-Compacting Concrete.
  12. Foti, D. (2011). Preliminary analysis of concrete reinforced with waste bottles PET fibers. Construction and Building Materials, 25(4), 1906–1915. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2010.11.066
  13. Foti, D. (2013). Use of recycled waste pet bottles fibers for the reinforcement of concrete. Composite Structures, 96, 396–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2012.09.019
  14. Hamad, A. J., & Sldozian, R. J. A. (2019). Flexural and flexural toughness of fiber reinforced concrete-American standard specifications review. GRD Journals-Global Research and Development Journal for Engineering, 4(3), 5–13.
  15. Hassan, A. A. A., Lachemi, M., & Hossain, K. M. A. (2012). Effect of metakaolin and silica fume on the durability of self-consolidating concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites, 34(6), 801–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEMCONCOMP.2012.02.013
  16. Hassan, S. A., Hemzah, S. A., & Alyhya, W. S. (2020). Experimental investigation of the structural behaviours of self-compacted reinforced concrete hollow beams with in-place circular openings. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 671(1), 012117. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/671/1/012117
  17. Ismail Al-Hadithi, A., & Ahmed Abbas, M. (2018). The effects of adding waste plastic fibers on the mechanical properties and shear strength of reinforced concrete beams. Iraqi Journal of Civil Engineering, 12(1), 110–124.
  18. Li, X., Zhang, W., Zhang, C., Liu, J., Li, L., & Wang, S. (2024). Flexural behavior of GFRP and steel bars reinforced lightweight ultra-high performance fiber-reinforced concrete beams with various reinforcement ratios. Structures, 70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107897
  19. Liu, N., & Chen, B. (2014). Experimental study of the influence of EPS particle size on the mechanical properties of EPS lightweight concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 68, 227–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.06.062
  20. Medher, A. H., Al-Hadithi, A. I., & Hilal, N. (2021). The Possibility of Producing Self-Compacting Lightweight Concrete by Using Expanded Polystyrene Beads as Coarse Aggregate. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 46(5), 4253–4270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-020-04886-9
  21. Naaman A, J. S. (1995). Structural ductility of concrete beams prestressed with FRP tendons. Proc Second Int RILEM Symp (FRPRCS-2): Non-Met (FRP) Concr Struct, Ghent, Belg, 86–379.
  22. Ochi, T., Okubo, S., & Fukui, K. (2007). Development of recycled PET fiber and its application as concrete-reinforcing fiber. Cement and Concrete Composites, 29(6), 448–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEMCONCOMP.2007.02.002
  23. Oudah, F., & El-Hacha, R. (2012). A new ductility model of reinforced concrete beams strengthened using Fiber Reinforced Polymer reinforcement. Composites Part B: Engineering, 43(8), 3338–3347. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPOSITESB.2012.01.071
  24. Pereira De Oliveira, L. A., & Castro-Gomes, J. P. (2011). Physical and mechanical behaviour of recycled PET fibre reinforced mortar. Construction and Building Materials, 25(4), 1712–1717. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2010.11.044
  25. Şahmaran, M., Yaman, I. Ö., & Tokyay, M. (2009). Transport and mechanical properties of self consolidating concrete with high volume fly ash. Cement and Concrete Composites, 31(2), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEMCONCOMP.2008.12.003
  26. Saleh Ahari, R., Erdem, T. K., & Ramyar, K. (2015). Permeability properties of self-consolidating concrete containing various supplementary cementitious materials. Construction and Building Materials, 79, 326–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.01.053
  27. Silva, D. A., Betioli, A. M., Gleize, P. J. P., Roman, H. R., Gómez, L. A., & Ribeiro, J. L. D. (2005). Degradation of recycled PET fibers in Portland cement-based materials. Cement and Concrete Research, 35(9), 1741–1746. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEMCONRES.2004.10.040
  28. Yoon, Y.-S., Yang, J.-M., Min, K.-H., & Shin, H.-O. (2011). Flexural strength and deflection characteristics of high-strength concrete beams with hybrid FRP and steel bar reinforcement. Special Publication, 275, 1–22.